Skip to main content

Recent HBD Update

The March 6 update to the HBD engine features some important developments we should all be aware of. mnnorthstars mentioned one of these in the chat page: Spring Training playing time now has increased importance. Specifically, those with adequate playing time could get a friendlier boost in ratings, and big league players who don't get enough playing time can take a hit in their ratings. This latter element is the key thing here to note.

As far as what equals adequate( or as tzentmeyer called it "enough") playing time, we don't know yet. Since this update is so recent, there have yet to be any studies in the forum. Before the update, I tried to get as many players as possible 40 at bats and 15-20 innings for starting pitchers to capture the Spring ratings boost.

Perhaps when ST is over some of us can report back here with the varying results of playing time.

The other update to the engine involes rookies and big league service time. Previously, you could call up rookies roughly 12-15 games into the season and avoid them garnering enough big league service days for their first big league season, effectively giving you an extra year with those cheap youngsters. Now, it sounds like you'll want to wait around 20-25 games for the same effect. We can call this the Evan Longoria effect, since that is clearly what the Rays(no longer the Devil Rays, though) are doing with him this season.

Comments

Saffron said…
I just went through Spring Training in another league. As opposed to Robert, my norm in ST has been to give each of my ML position players 20-25 AB's, SP's 10 - 15 IP and RP 3-7 IP's.

There were two players who had ratings drops (unusual in my experience after ST). One was my 29 year old starting CF who lost a point in hitting against right handers -- he garnered 29 AB's in ST. The other was a 33 year old RP who lost a point in the effectiveness of his first pitch after pitching 4 1/3 innings. The latter player might have lost his point due to his age, but I doubt that's the case for the CF. Oddly, his 29 AB's was the highest among all my players this spring and everyone else either retained their ratings or gained. Logically the biggest gains were with younger players who were able to get some playing time (up 2 points in a handful of categories).
rls said…
thanks for the input, jon. seeing your numbers, i've lowered mine to more than 35 plate appearances for batters. btw, what was the make-up for the centerfielder who lost a point?
Saffron said…
As an addendum to my first comment -- In the other leaguemy offense has been pretty good to start but my usually reliable pitching staff has been getting bombed. Maybe they needed more IP in ST.

Popular posts from this blog

Anaheim Anteaters Future Shock: Top 10 Prospects

1/ SP Hugh Palmer . Age 24. AAA. ETA: S10 Selected 13th in the 1st round of the S6 draft, Palmer dominated the lower minors and has averaged a 16-4/3.35 record in 3 minor league seasons. Palmer's big calling card has been the punchout as he's K'd 502 batters in 51o frames. His heater is in the mid-90s and still developing. Palmer comes with 2 good pitchers, the fastball and slider, but could use a better forkball and curveball to sharpen his repertoire. Palmer's about a season away from the bigs and projects to a solid #2 or #3 starter. 2/ SP Vasco Almonte . Age 22. AAA. ETA: S10 A former 1st round draft pick by Atlanta/Chicago, Almonte was traded to Anaheim for fellow prospect Tony Mendoza . Almonte has been consistent in the minors, if unspectacular, with a 4.15 era and 1.32 whip. However, Almonte is just 22 and has progressed quickly through the minors with a AAA season already in the books. If he continues to develop his fastball and change-up he can become a stalwa

HBD Ballpark Factors

Ballpark effects are ranked on a scale from - 4 to + 4, based on their impact on hits (1B), doubles (2B), triples (3B), home runs to left field (HR LF) and home runs to right field (HR RF). The more negative or positive number, the more extreme the effect for that hit in that direction. These numbers are just indicators of the relative effect in the simulation engine. They are important for users and founded entirely on historical fact, but are meant for display purposes and not explicitly used in the simulation engine. City/State Ballpark Capacity 1B 2B 3B LF RF PF Division  Albuquerque (New Mexico) Isotopes Park 11,124 4 4 4 1 0 1.211 West  Anaheim (California) Angel Stadium 45,050 0 -2 -2 0 0 0.951 West  Atlanta (Georgia) Turner Field 50,062 -1 -1 0 1 1 0.950 South, East  Arizona (Arizo